Infinity Essays - Cardinal Numbers, Infinity, Elementary Mathematics

Endlessness Most everybody knows about the endlessness image, the one that seems as though the number eight tipped over on its side. Boundlessness in some cases manifests in ordinary discourse as a standout type of the word many. However, what number of is endlessly many? How huge is vastness? Does boundlessness truly exist? You can't check to vastness. However we are OK with the possibility that there are limitlessly numerous numbers to tally with; regardless of how huge a number you may concoct, another person can think of a greater one; that number in addition to one, in addition to two, times two, and numerous others. There essentially is no greatest number. You can demonstrate this with a straightforward confirmation by inconsistency. Confirmation: Assume there is a biggest number, n. Consider n+1. n+1*n. Along these lines the announcement is bogus and its inconsistency, ?there is no biggest whole number,? is valid. This hypothesis is substantial dependent on the ?Validity of Proof by Contradiction.? In 1895, a German mathematician by the name of Georg Cantor acquainted a path with depict vastness utilizing number sets. The quantity of components in a set is called its cardinality. For instance, the cardinality of the set {3, 8, 12, 4} is 4. This set is limited since it is conceivable to include the entirety of the components in it. Typically, cardinality has been identified by including the quantity of components in the set, yet Cantor made this a stride farther. Since it is difficult to include the quantity of components in an unending set, Cantor said that an unbounded set has No components; By this meaning of No, No+1=No. He said that a set like this is countable endless, which implies that you can place it into a 1-1 correspondence. A 1-1 correspondence can be found in sets that have a similar cardinality. For instance, {1, 3, 5, 7, 9}has a 1-1 correspondence with {2, 4, 6, 8, 10}. Sets, for example, these are countable limited, which implies that it is conceivable to include the components in the set. Cantor took the possibility of 1-1 correspondence a stage farther, however. He said that there is a 1-1 correspondence between the arrangement of positive whole numbers and the arrangement of positive even whole numbers. For example {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ...n ...} has a 1-1 correspondence with {2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, ...2n ...}. This idea appears to be somewhat off from the start, yet looking at the situation objectively, it bodes well. You can add 1 to any whole number to get the following one, and you can likewise add 2 to any even number to acquire the following even whole number, subsequently they will go on vastly with a 1-1 correspondence. Certain endless sets are not 1-1, however. Lope established that the arrangement of genuine numbers is uncountable, and they along these lines can not be placed into a 1-1 correspondence with the arrangement of positive whole numbers. To demonstrate this, you utilize backhanded thinking. Confirmation: Suppose there were a lot of genuine numbers that resembles as follows first 4.674433548... second 5.000000000... third 723.655884543... fourth 3.547815886... fifth 17.08376433... sixth 0.00000023... etc, were every decimal is thought of as an unbounded decimal. Show that there is a genuine number r that isn't on the rundown. Leave r alone any number whose first decimal spot is not the same as the principal decimal spot in the main number, whose second decimal spot is not quite the same as the second decimal spot in the second number, etc. One such number is r=0.5214211... Since r is a genuine number that contrasts from each number on the rundown, the rundown doesn't contain every single genuine number. Since this contention can be utilized with any rundown of genuine numbers, no rundown can incorporate the entirety of the reals. In this way, the arrangement of every single genuine number is limitless, yet this is an alternate endlessness from No. The letter c is utilized to speak to the cardinality of the reals. C is bigger than No. Vastness is an extremely disputable point in science. A few contentions were made by a man named Zeno, a Greek mathematician who lived around 2300 years back. A lot of Cantor's work attempts to discredit his hypotheses. Zeno stated, ? There is no movement since that which moved must show up at the center of its course before it shows up at the

The education system is meritocratic Essay Example

The training framework is meritocratic Paper The training framework is seen from multiple points of view by various sociologists. When discussing the training framework sociologists are alluding to types of instruction where individuals experience auxiliary socialization which is the relearning of the standards and qualities mastered during essential socialization in the family; it is additionally seen as an operator of social control where kids are educated to comply with social orders desires and they are shown this through the concealed educational program which is exercises which arent part of the national educational program which the administration says are should have been adapted yet are exercises, for example, how to be devoted and who to be submissive to. The arrangement of meritocracy that the ones who do well are compensated and the ones who not do well are not I. e. the individuals who do the best land the best position. The meritocratic perspective on the training framework implies that the framework is reasonable and bolsters all be that as it may, different sociologists dispose of this view as legitimizing an arrangement of imbalance where a few people duty to riches/class show improvement over others. Functionalists accept that the training framework is meritocratic. A meritocracy is the possibility that the individuals who buckle down get rewards this is the view the most focused understudies get the best grades and proceed to land the best positions they accept that it is distinction in social qualities that lead to contrasts in class results which have been seen consistently and were apparent toward the finish of the ongoing scholastic year with youngsters in the most elevated social classes showing improvement over those in the least social classes. We will compose a custom paper test on The training framework is meritocratic explicitly for you for just $16.38 $13.9/page Request now We will compose a custom paper test on The training framework is meritocratic explicitly for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Recruit Writer We will compose a custom article test on The training framework is meritocratic explicitly for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Recruit Writer Trough this arrangement of meritocracy there is a uniformity of chance which is the place school makes a framework where all individuals can become equivalent regardless of what class, sex or ethnicity everybody has a similar chance to turn into a cop or a specialist. This meritocracy is said to filter and sort point of view understudies into their right situations as a grown-up in the public eye. As per Parsons school is just the extension between the family or essential socialization and section to business. He sees the training framework as a positive arrangement of setting the best understudies at the top both in school and in the long run the work place. This thought is upheld by Davis and Moore (1945) who state that meritocracy is the framework which social organizations (this incorporates school) use to filter and sort its individuals into various situations along these lines they accept that school is meritocratic. They see meritocracy as permitting the standards of definition to occur where people are place and propelled into various positions. Marxists condemn Davis and Moore for having outrageous traditionalist perspectives and being very class based. Functionalists see meritocracy as being apparent in the public eye and they use proof, for example, the ascent of common laborers youngsters in colleges as there has been an ascent of average workers kids in advanced education than in the fifties supporting the possibility of a meritocracy. This view anyway like others faces investigation from Marxists who state the verification that is given isnt as indisputable as would be made out as the development of colleges has to a great extent profited the bourgeoisie as there are increasingly center and high society individuals in colleges. They state that meritocracy is made yes so as to legitimize the framework they see the couple of common laborers kids in colleges as letting a couple through to keep the rest peaceful as it implies individuals acknowledge their situations as though I would have worked more enthusiastically I could have accomplished this. Marxists then because of this reality see the training as out of line and not meritocratic. They do anyway accept that there is a legend of meritocracy which was made up to legitimize the arrangement of injustice in which the bourgeoisie rule and the working class are misused. The fantasy of meritocracy sets up a method of causing the common laborers to acknowledge that they are average workers and will consistently be regular workers this is the place legitimizing comes in they accept that the couple of working people kids that go to college make the remainder of the working people believe that its conceivable however they just didnt make enough of an effort to accomplish the top positions and along these lines as Althusser discusses a submissive and respectful workforce is created in light of the fact that the training arrangement of an industrialist society passes on the conviction through meritocracy that it is reasonable and the poor ought to acknowledge their neediness as its their shortcoming as they didnt make enough of an effort or they played. The legend of meritocracy is spoken about by Bowles and Gintis they said that school allocated understudies into occupations however said this was not a positive idea but rather a negative one which was legitimized by the fantasy of meritocracy where there is a thought that meritocracy exists and this is taken care of through the concealed educational program as youngsters are told through school in the event that you buckle down you can accomplish this yet this doesnt exist its just said to not exclusively to ensure there isn't an uprising against the industrialist framework yet in addition repeat the classes. Marxists condemn functionalists thoughts behind meritocracy for various reasons. Functionalists state that the free instruction framework is confirmation of reasonableness in any case, Marxists differ and talk about the presence of language structure schools (whose understudies are for the most part from the white collar class) and tuition based schools which are additionally extremely working class foundations and government funded schools which are unreasonably costly for anybody outside the privileged and on the grounds that these schools exist and have better subsidizing and more cash they can manage the cost of the best things to assist understudies with progressing admirably. Marxists additionally accept that there are disservices for regular workers kids before they even beginning school this through things, for example, material hardship this is average workers kids cannot bear the cost of things that others can, for example, guides and now and again PCs this implies they have impeded assets so they cant potentially have a similar possibility as others. Additionally Bourdieu however scrutinized for being socially inclination and proposing the regular workers culture is a denied one he gets the point that instructors are white collar class thus schools are center establishments and consequently the average workers cannot fit in just as the white collar class who have social capital do the best which is demonstrated quite a long time after year when GCSE and A-Level outcomes are discharged. They are additionally hindered in the manner that they speak; Labov and Bernstein talk about discourse codes and how these detriment the average workers. Bernstein talked around two various types of discourse codes these are expounded which are spellbinding this is a working class method of talking and what is required in school and confining which is informal and comprises of slang words which make a perspective on an individual not being as brilliant. Labov proceeded to state that we should be mindful so as not to accept a confined discourse code implies that an individual is thick in any case, decisions are made dependent on the manner in which individuals talk; due to these drawbacks the framework can not be meritocratic as meritocracy depends on an arrangement of decency and relies upon individuals being equivalent from the earliest starting point. Interactionalists concur with Labov and Bernstein as they concur that individuals are marked on what they look like and sound so in what manner can their be a meritocracy if individuals are dealt with contrastingly as per parts of their character? The interactionalist approach is for the most part against the possibility of a meritocracy since they accept that educator naming exists and George Herbert Mead talked about emblematic interactionalism where our conduct is to some extent made by the manner in which we are treated by everyone around us; specifically critical others which ar e individuals who have force and control in our lives, for example, guardians, instructors, companions and accomplices. Specifically the job of instructors in training is gotten upon as Jacobson and Rosenthal (1968) found that when a gathering of youngsters came up from elementary school all at a similar level they told educators that some excelled on a test they made which anticipated future virtuoso this was a phony test and they picked arbitrarily who might be the scholarly drawers after a term they returned and found those that were named as scholarly knickers shown improvement over others this demonstrates meritocracy can not exist as instructors mark and can change results so few out of every odd one gets a reasonable possibility as though your named as splendid youll improve and if your not you wont do also. David Gillborn whos look into is to a great extent ethnographic and still proceeds right up 'til the present time said in his book Racism and Education: Coincidence or Conspiracy distributed in 2008 that the framework isn't intended to elevate equity yet to keep up the accomplishment hole between the white understudies and those students of ethnic minorities by expressing this he quickly dismisses the possibility of a meritocracy as meritocracy is about individuals having uniformity from the earliest starting point and being decided upon difficult work be that as it may, if individuals are decided upon by ethnicity reasonableness can't exist. Proof for this is Gillborn discovered that there was race marking in the Local instruction Authorities (LEA) who expected an ascent in white understudies achievement of 40 percent however just a 17 percent ascend in that of dark students and on the grounds that interactionalists accept that we are to a great extent molded by everyone around us in the event that dark students are not expected to do also, at that point they won't; this is simply the possibility of a satisfying prediction where a kid in constantly told that they won't progress nicely so they don't progress admirably. Stephan Ball

Peek Over Our Shoulders What Rioters Are Reading on January 19, 2017

Peek Over Our Shoulders What Rioters Are Reading on January 19, 2017 In this feature at Book Riot, we give you a glimpse of what we are reading this very moment. Here is what the Rioters are reading today (as in literally today). This is what’s on their bedside table (or the floor, work bag, desk, whatevskis). See a Rioter who is reading your favorite book? I’ve included the link that will take you to their author archives (meaning, that magical place that organizes what they’ve written for the site). Gird your loins â€" this list combined with all of those archived posts will make your TBR list EXPLODE. We’ve shown you ours, now show us yours; let us know what you’re reading (right this very moment) in the comment section below! Andi Miller Searching for Sunday: Loving, Leaving, and Finding the Church by Rachel Held Evans: The ultimate memoir for doubting, resistant Christians. If you’re into equality, realness, and actual conversations about hard topics and interested in inviting more Christians to the proverbial table, this is the book. (Audio) The Turner House by Angela Flournoy: Charm and soul and a great narrative voice. I was immediately hooked into this story of the 13 Turner siblings as they figure out what to do with their increasingly dependent mother and their family home. (Ebook) Molly Wetta Difficult Women by Roxane Gay: I read a few stories of this as an advanced copy, but I waited for it to come out in print to read it again in its entirety. (library hardcover) Breathless by Beverly Jenkins: I’m still not finding much in contemporary romance that I like, so I figured I’d try an different historical period and see if I could get into that. This is the second in the Old West series, and features one of my favorite romance plots: childhood friends who meet later as adults. Hannah Engler A Woman Looking at Men Looking At Women by Siri Hustvedt: blowing my mind, but slow going. (Hardcover) Whatever Happened to Interracial Love? Stories By Kathleen Collins: I’m listening to this as I walk around campus in the snow. Yesterday it made me cry twice: once on my way to the gym, and once after I got off the phone with my mom (who I’d called to gush about it). (Audio) The Stranger Beside Me by Ann Rule: I’m obsessed with true crime shows and podcasts, but I’m just getting into true crime books. This one is a classic about a crime reporter who was close friends with Ted Bundy years before he was convicted for his killings. (Audio) Jessica Woodbury   Stay With Me by Ayobami Adebayo: Set in Nigeria, this story of a tumultuous marriage is a fascinating mix of soap opera-worthy twists with serious literary heft. When Yejide still isn’t pregnant after several years of marriage, her husband’s family gets him a new wife. (e-galley) The Sun Is Also a Star by Nicola Yoon: Yes, I know, everyone loves this book but I just barely got to it and it’s clear that I underestimated just how much I was going to love it. (audio) Sarah Nicolas The Hidden Brain: How Our Unconscious Minds Elect Presidents, Control Markets, Wage Wars, and Save Our Lives by Shankar Vedantam: I have made an informal commitment to reading more nonfiction this year so this was the start of that (and a great start, at that). (Audiobook) Glass Sword by Victoria Aveyard: Catching up (library audiobook) Once We Were (The Hybrid Chronicles, #2) by Kate Zhang: I really enjoyed the first book in this series, so I downloaded this one, too. (Library audiobook) James Wallace Harris Hidden Figures by Margot Lee Shetterly: I loved the movie, but the movie is only a tiny portion of the book. Read the book to get the whole story, it’s worth it. I’m listening to White Trash: The 400-Year Untold Story of Class in America by Nancy Isenberg. Wow! What a history lesson. If you think Trump is scary, wait till you get to the chapter on Andrew Jackson. Jessica Yang If I Was Your Girl by Meredith Russo: I loved the interview with the author and had to check it out! (hardcover) Love is the Drug by Alaya Dawn Johnson: I liked Alaya Dawn Johnsons othe YA book, The Summer Prince, and Ive had this book on my shelf collecting dust for a while. Finally got started on it! (paperback) Liberty Hardy   One Day Well All Be Dead and None of This Will Matter: Essays by Scaachi Koul (Picador, May 2): Picked this up based on the title alone, but the essays I have read so far are also compelling. (galley) The Hate U Give by Angie Thomas (Balzer + Bray, Feb. 28): Plucked from the headlines, this book is really brutal and necessary. (e-galley) The Girl in Green by Derek B. Miller: I can’t resist a book being hailed as the 21st century’s Catch-22. (hardcover) Murder as a Fine Art by David Morrell: Continuing on with my current reading streak of books about Victorian-era murders. Please @ me with all your suggestions, fiction or nonfiction! (paperback) Tasha Brandstatter The Convenient Marriage by Georgette Heyer: It’s narrated by Richard Armitage. Nuff said. (audiobook) Artistic License by Elle Pierson: I can’t resist a book about artists, and this was recommended on the Goodreads page for Act Like It. I didn’t know the author of the two books was actually the same person until after I started reading. (ebook) Jan Rosenberg History Of Wolves by Emily Fredlund:  A very unsettling coming-of-age story. It’s one of the many 2017 debuts that I’ve been excited to read. I’ve got a thing for wolves. Actual wolves, not werewolves. Recommended via the All The Books podcast. E.H. Kern The Rise of Io by Wesley Chu:  After reading Chu’s Tao Trilogy I was convinced that the world of the Quasings and their adventures on Earth had given us everything there was to give. Not so, as The Rise of Io clearly shows. A great read that introduces us to Ella, yet another complex and reluctant hero created by Chu. (Hardcover Special Edition) Katie McLain The Bees by Laline Paull:  This was marketed as The Handmaid’s Tale meets The Hunger Games, but with bees. I’m not seeing much Hunger Games in the story, but the book itself is fascinating. It’s told completely from the perspective of a worker bee as she navigates the caste system and responsibilities of her hive. The language is gorgeous, and I’ve totally bought into this story about bee life. (digital audio) My Sister Rosa by Justine Larbalestier:  A book about a psychologically creepy child? Heck yes. I’m really digging this complex YA novel about an Australian family who moves to New York City, with their two children Che and Rosa. Che is 17 and is responsible for looking after his 10-year-old sister, Rosa, except Rosa is unlike most 10 year old girls. She lies, she manipulates, she hurts people for the fun of it, and everyone, including Che’s parents, has completely fallen for her charm. Everyone except Che, that is. It sounds like it’s one step away from becoming a Law Order episode, but I’m hoping it’ll avoid the melodrama in favor of a nuanced psychological portrait. (Library hardcover) Priya Sridhar Skunks Dance by St. John Karp:  I’m reading an advanced reader’s copy of this. So far I have to admit that burning someone’s car down isn’t the same as tossing a rock through a window, and that a girl is lucky if she can buy a car for four hundred dollars. Two teens hunt for an ancient treasure, while in the past their ancestors carry on a huge feud. (Paperback) I’m Dyin’ Here: A Life in Paper by Tim Groan:  Print journalism is dying, if not already dead. Tim Groban muses on giving several decades to the profession. He has a dry approach to his life, and how it’s measured within the columns. (Paperback) Karina Glaser Salt to the Sea by Ruta Sepetys: I’ve been meaning to read this for months and finally grabbed it off of the library shelves. (Library Hardcover) Midnight Without a Moon by Linda Williams Jackson: This book, based on a true event in Mississippi in 1955, is told from the point of view of eleven-year-old Rose Lee Carter. A terrific read so far, and I can’t wait to finish it. (Hardcover) Born a Crime by Trevor Noah: I’m listening to the audiobook, narrated by Noah himself, and it’s a fantastic memoir of his life growing up in South Africa. (Audiobook) Kristen McQuinn Miranda and Caliban by Jacqueline Carey: This is a gorgeous, atmospheric revision of The Tempest, full of Careys typical rich world building. Its beautiful and heartbreaking and gives readers a back story of Mirandas childhood on the island, growing up with Caliban. (E-galley, Tor, March 2017). Hag Seed by Margaret Atwood: I just started this retelling of The Tempest so I dont know yet how I feel about it. If its like every other Atwood Ive read, Im going to love it. I certainly do so far! Also, one of my friends was actually asked by the Atwood Society to write a review of Hag Seed (holy shit, thats awesome!!) and so I want to read this so I know what she was raving about. Other than the fact that its Margaret Atwood and of course she was raving about it. (Hardback). Steph Auteri   Alexander Hamilton by Ron Chernow: I’m obsessed with the musical. How could I not? (Paperback) A Lowcountry Heart by Pat Conroy: This posthumously published collection of Conroy’s blog posts and speeches was a Christmas gift from my parents. I fell for Conroy’s writing by filching the books from their shelves, so it was a fitting gift. (Paperback) Love Is Love edited by Marc Andreyko. This gorgeous comic anthology was created in the wake of the Orlando Pulse shooting. I learned about it when I started reading feminist comics. I find myself crying every other page. (Paperback) Thomas Maluck How They Croaked: The Awful Ends of the Awfully Famous by Georgia Bragg Kevin O’Malley: I am reading this book for a library trivia program, and it is flush with little-discussed factoids surrounding the lives and especially deaths of 19 historical figures. This book is aimed at a young audience, but I think Bragg’s casual, humorous writing style and O’Malley’s playful illustrations will attract many a morbid curiosity. This book originally came out in 2011, but famous deaths are timeless. (Hardback) Lucas Maxwell George by Alex Gino. I’ve seen several students in the high school I work at reading this and never got a chance to pick it up until recently. George is an elementary school student that was born a boy but knows in her heart that she’s a girl. George has the chance to play Charlotte in the school’s production of Charlotte’s Web. By putting herself forward, she might be exposing more than she wants to. A fast, poignant read that all students should share! Johann Thorsson The Warren by Brian Evenson. Saw this along with the words “smart science fiction horror novella.” I’ve read some of Evenson’s work before so I knew this would be good. And so far it’s everything promised. (eBook) The Nightly Disease by Max Booth III. Reading this because I like Max’s Litreactor columns and was intrigued. So far this is filthy and crazy and great fun. (eBook) The Long Way to a Small Angry Planet by Becky Chambers. This has been mentioned to me so many times by so many people that I just had to. Also a sucker for pretty covers, and this one is certainly that. (paperback) Jamie Canaves Human Acts by Han Kang, Deborah Smith (translation): The Vegetarian was dark and deliciously smart and one of my favorite reads so I’ve been anticipating this novel for a while. So far it’s just as dark as The Vegetarian but instead of weird it’s unique, and even though it’s a devastating subject Kang’s writing is fantastic and the narrators (including Sandra Oh!) are amazing. I’m having a really hard time putting it down. (audiobook) No One Is Coming to Save Us by Stephanie Powell Watts (Ecco, April 4th): I picked this up for the title and have been treated to great writing and characters that I can’t stop thinking about. (egalley) The Astonishing Mistakes of Dahlia Moss by Max Wirestone (Redhook, March 14th): It doesn’t always work out but that doesn’t stop me from needing to read anything with a Veronica Mars comp. (ARC) The Roanoke Girls by Amy Engel (Crown, March 7th): Roanoke girls never last long around here. In the end, we either run or we die,” made me need to read this book. So far the chapters alternate between past and present and I’m 100% invested. (egalley) Sonja Palmer Dreadnought by April Daniels (Diversion, January 24th): This is about Danny Tozer, a transgender teenage girl who becomes a superhero and gets the body she always wanted, while having to battle supervillians. Yes, please! (egalley) History is All You Left Me by Adam Silvera (Soho Teen, January 17th). I LOVED More Happy than Not, so when this came up, I immediately requested it. Silvera’s writing stays with you for a long time. (egalley) Amanda Kay Oaks Difficult Women by Roxane Gay (Crown): I’m reading this book because Roxane Gay. I feel like that’s the only explanation necessary. (egalley). Small Admission by Amy Poeppel (Atria): I’m making my way through all of the egalleys I requested back in 2016, and this one was next on the list. It’s about a young woman who has a breakdown after a breakup (which turns out to be about more than just the breakup), and about the job that helps pull her back into the world. The story is told from multiple perspectives, which makes it an interesting read. (egalley). Aram Mrjoian The Refugees by Viet Thanh Nguyen: This was my most anticipated book of 2017 and it is not disappointing. I am in love with Nguyen’s well-paced and elegant short stories. Despite being bogged down with homework, I haven’t been able to put it down. (ARC) Erin Burba In the Country We Love: A Family Divided by Diane Guerrero: I wasn’t familiar with Diane Guerrero- an actor best known for her roles on Jane the Virgin and Orange is the New Black prior to listening to this. The book caught my eye because of the 2017 Book Riot Reading Challenge Task #5: Read a book by an immigrant or with a central immigration narrative. (audiobook) Commonwealth by Ann Patchett: I’ve been meaning to read this since it came out it’s finally time. I’ve just started, and it’s very entertaining so far. (ebook) Megan Cavitt Black Panther: A Nation Under Our Feet, vol. 1 by Ta-Nehisi Coates (story) and Brian Stelfreeze (art): THIS FINALLY CAME IN AT MY LIBRARY AND I AM CAPSLOCKING EVERYWHERE. (library paperback) The Martian Chronicles by Ray Bradbury: I’m continuing my unintentional trend of buying sci-fi classics for dirt-cheap at garage and library sales. So far this is solidifying my belief that science fiction is the best genre for unflinching examination of society’s flaws. (hardcover) Julia Pistell   Kindred: A Graphic Novel by Damian Duffy (Adapter), Octavia E. Butler (Author), John Jennings (Illustrator). I was chomping at the bit to get my hands on this graphic novel adaptation of the classic Octavia Butler sci-fi novel, and so far, it’s not disappointing. Gotta go get back to the arresting graphics, racing plot, and emotional core that makes this adaptation a single-sitting read. Elizabeth Allen My Grandmother Asked Me to Tell You She’s Sorry by Frederik Backman I am reading this for my local indie bookstore’s monthly book group. This was a slow starter for me, but I found myself continually touched by the innocence of fairy tales and how they so easily reflect the realities of adulthood. (paperback) Inside Scientology by Janet Reitman:  Continuing my never-ending obsession with all things Scientology, this is a great, in-depth glimpse into one of the world’s youngest and most controversial “religions”. Reitman gives the reader great insight into the motivations of L. Ron Hubbard. I can’t wait until I get further into the book and learn more about their most recent history. (paperback) Alison Doherty On Beauty by Zadie Smith: I’ve been meaning to read Zadie Smith for almost a decade, so when I saw this prominently displayed at a used book store I decided the time was now. The writing is so beautiful and specific I’m made at myself for waiting so long. (paperback) The Queen of the Tearling by Erika Johansen: This was highly recommended by a family member at Thanksgiving. I’m only two chapters in but feel completely immersed in this fantasy world. (paperback) Kelly Anderson Hag-Seed by Margaret Atwood: It seems to be my year for Shakespeare retellings. I just read Miranda and Caliban, which I very much enjoyed (out next month and you should totally check it out if this is your thing!), and this seemed like a good follow up. I am enjoying it so far- a bit different than your typical Atwood, but in a good way. The Privileges by Jonathan Dee: Nearly done with this. I’d heard such good things about the haunting, memorable, vivid first section. They weren’t wrong about that-its worth the price of admission to the whole book. The Bookshop by Penelope Fitzgerald: Fitzgerald has been on my list to try for a long time, and I found this at a used bookstore yesterday. It was serendipity! Time to settle in and check her out and see if she’s all that she’s been advertised to be! Rebecca Hussey Umami by Laia Jufresa: I’m nearing the end of this warm, moving novel of friendship, family, and food set in Mexico City. (ebook) Ines Bellina Negroland by Margo Jefferson:I was intrigued by the book after reading an interview with Jefferson, where she spoke openly about the pressures and tensions of being a black woman with a substantial degree of socioeconomic privilege. Negroland examines the world of upper-class African-Americans through both a critical, historical, and personal lens. It’s the kind of story I don’t often hear about and few people are usually exposed to. (Library hardcover) Kay Taylor Rea   Pretty Face by Lucy Parker: (Carina Press, February 20) Parker’s first novel, Act Like It, is my go-to recommendation for contemporary romance newbies and I jumped at the chance to get my hands on this standalone set in the same universe. The fulsome worldbuilding of Parker’s West End theater scene, wonderfully realized characters, and steamy romance are all amazing. (e-galley) Not Your Sidekick by CB Lee: (Duet Books) I’ve been hearing good things about this YA superhero novel and its bisexual Asian American protagonist, so I suggested it for my book club’s next read. I’m pretty tired of the first person POV that pervades most of the YA market right now, so I’m loving the third person present tense used here. (ebook) Tracy Shapley The Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar Wilde: I’ve subscribed to about a billion book subscription boxes this year (that’s only a slight exaggeration) and I’ll only be reading books from said sub boxes this year. I’ll then be tracking various diversity elements of each of the sub boxes. The Picture of Dorian Gray was the January pick for Thrifty Books. For some reason I have been surprised so far by how clever this book is. (paperback) Difficult Women by Roxane Gay: This was the pick for My Lit Box and it is so fantastic that I’m dreading finishing it in about 15 pages. I love books that get to the quick of really painful, difficult subjects but I can be easily put off if that quick turns cloying or overly dramatic. Gay has a way of making me feel things deeply and then pulling me back right when I am on the verge of becoming overwhelmed. (hardcover) Claire Handscombe   Liccle Bit by Alex Wheaton:  Alex Wheaton is an undisputed star of the YA world in the UK thanks to his trilogy of novels set on a fictional inner-city London estate. He won the Guardian Children’s Author prize in 2016 for the second book in the series, and I was curious, so I’m starting at the beginning. And this book goes toward my British Books Challenge for 2017, too. Creativity and Feature Writing by Ellie Levenson:  This is the year I finally get to be a full-time writer, which means I need to get serious about my freelance journalism. This book is all about getting ideas, and it’s working: after I’d read five pages I brainstormed 30 potential pieces I can pitch. (Paperback.) Chelsea Hensley Tell Me Again How A Crush Should Feel by Sara Farizan: This one’s been recommended to me a bunch, and it was on sale for a time so I’m finally picking it up. (ebook) Archie Vol. 2  by Mark Waid: I’m prepping for the live-action Riverdale show premiering later this month so I’m sucking up all the Archie I can get (paperback) Ashley Bowen-Murphy The Codex by Lev Grossman: I am still reading books that use the Voynich Manuscript as a plot device. Picked this one up at my library and am slowly getting into it. (hardback) Dangerous Pregnancies: Mothers, Disabilities, and Abortion in Modern America by Leslie J. Reagan: Technically, I’m reading this history of the 1964 Rubella outbreak, reproductive rights, and disability activism for work. Honestly, though, I’d read it even if it wasn’t related to my job. (hardback) Jamie Moore Make Your Home Among Strangers by Jennine Capó Crucet: Currently reading this novel about a first generation Cuban American navigating the college experience while dealing with the pressures she faces at home. The Sellout by Paul Beatty: I was apprehensive about this text when I heard it was satire, but the praise is incredibly well deserved. Maddie Rodriguez Crosstalk by Connie Willis: I’m still working my way through the books I received as Christmas gifts (lucky me!). I didn’t get around to reading this one immediately after it came out and then foolishly put it on my Christmas list and thus was forbidden from buying it for myself. Finally, the wait is over! I’ve been a huge fan of basically every other novel Connie Willis has written so I’m sure I will love this romantic comedy that delves into issues of technology, empathy and way, way too much information. (hardcover) Peter Damien Letterman: The Last Giant of Late-Night by Jason Zinoman (Harper, April 11th: This is the second book in a row on Late Nite talk shows and their backstage politics that I’ve read (the first being The War for Late Night by Bill Carter). I’m a sucker for Hollywood books anyhow, but these are proving to be particularly addictive reads. I was never a huge Letterman fan (my Late Nite interest began and ended with Craig Ferguson), but this is an excellent book that paints a very compelling story about a complicated, not terribly pleasant person. (e-galley) Star Trek: Enterprise: Rise of the Federation: Uncertain Logic by Christopher L Bennett: you take what you get with Star Trek novels sometimes. They can be astonishingly well-written and compelling, or clunky as hell. This one falls somewhere in between. Still, it’s a fun book, and it’s scratching not only the endless Star Trek itch I possess, but also the Enterprise one which I’ve acquired over the past month, as I rewatch the show and recall yet again that it really was a lot better than people gave it credit for. If I have one complaint about this Trek novel, it’s that the type font appears to be mimeographed on the page, it’s so small. I’m all but using a magnifying glass to read it. (mass market paperback) Nikki DeMarco Big Magic by Elizabeth Gilbert: I just started this nonfiction on living a creative life, but I’m already feeling more inspired. I’ve heard amazing things about the podcast of the same name by Gilbert and thought I’d start with the book. It’s simple and true and putting a fire under the creative side of my life. I don’t think it’ll take me very long to finish and immediately start again.